Spätzle Pfanne vs Rinderroulade
Overall, Rinderroulade has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Spätzle Pfanne | Rinderroulade |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 109 kcal | 90 kcal |
| Fat | 3 g | 2.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.9 g | 1.1 g |
| Sugars | 1.5 g | 0.8 g |
| Salt | 2.3 g | 1.1 g |
| Fiber | 2 g | — |
| Protein | 6.8 g | 6.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Gluten, Milk, Soybeans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rinderroulade has 17% fewer calories (90 kcal vs 109 kcal).
- Rinderroulade has 47% less sugar (0.8 g vs 1.5 g).
- Rinderroulade has 52% less salt (1.1 g vs 2.3 g).
- Rinderroulade has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Spätzle Pfanne lists: Eggs, Gluten, Milk, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Spätzle Pfanne
gegarte Eierspätzle (38%) (Wasser, HARTWEIZENGRIESS *, HÜHNEREI *, Salz), marinierte, gegarte Hähnchenbrust (13%), (Hähnchenbrust (für AT: Hühnerbrust), Salz, Sojaöl, Dextrose), Karotten, frittierte Zwiebeln (Zwiebeln, Rapsöl), Champignons, Prinzessbohnen, (für AT: Fisolen), Brokkoli, Wasser, Sonnenblumenöl, Salz, Petersilie, Butter, Muskatnuss, schwarzer Pfeffer
Rinderroulade
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Spätzle Pfanne or Rinderroulade?
Overall, Rinderroulade has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rinderroulade has fewer calories: 90 kcal versus 109 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rinderroulade has less sugar: 0.8 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.