Rinderroulade vs Pasta Snack Rahm Sauce
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rinderroulade | Pasta Snack Rahm Sauce |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 90 kcal | 105 kcal |
| Fat | 2.7 g | 2.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.1 g | 1.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.8 g | 2.5 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.7 g |
| Protein | 6.2 g | 3.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rinderroulade has 14% fewer calories (90 kcal vs 105 kcal).
- Rinderroulade has 68% less sugar (0.8 g vs 2.5 g).
- Pasta Snack Rahm Sauce has 33% less salt (0.7 g vs 1.1 g).
- Rinderroulade has 47% more protein (6.2 g vs 3.3 g).
- Pasta Snack Rahm Sauce has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Rinderroulade
Not available.
Pasta Snack Rahm Sauce
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rinderroulade or Pasta Snack Rahm Sauce?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rinderroulade has fewer calories: 90 kcal versus 105 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rinderroulade has less sugar: 0.8 g versus 2.5 g per 100 g.