Comparison

Rinderroulade vs Klassischer Kartoffelsalat

Overall, Rinderroulade has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRinderrouladeKlassischer Kartoffelsalat
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group — 4
Calories 90 kcal 187 kcal
Fat 2.7 g 13.5 g
Saturated fat 1.1 g 1 g
Sugars 0.8 g 2.8 g
Salt 1.1 g 1.4 g
Fiber — 1.2 g
Protein 6.2 g 1.4 g
Additives06
AllergensNone listedCelery, Crustaceans, Eggs, Milk, Mustard, Sesame seeds, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Rinderroulade has 52% fewer calories (90 kcal vs 187 kcal).
  • Rinderroulade has 80% less fat (2.7 g vs 13.5 g).
  • Rinderroulade has 71% less sugar (0.8 g vs 2.8 g).
  • Rinderroulade has 77% more protein (6.2 g vs 1.4 g).
  • Only Klassischer Kartoffelsalat lists: Celery, Crustaceans, Eggs, Milk, Mustard, Sesame seeds, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Rinderroulade

Not available.

Klassischer Kartoffelsalat

62% Kartoffeln, Rapsöl, Wasser, 5% Gurken, 5% Zwiebeln, Branntweinessig, Zucker, Speisesalz, Hühnereigelb, Petersilie, Säureregulator: Natriumacetate, Konservierungsstoffe: Kaliumsorbat und Natriumbenzoat, Gewürze (enthält Senf), modifizierte Stärke, färbendes Lebens - mittel: Karottenkonzentrat, Verdickungsmittel: Guarkernmehl und Xanthan. Kann Spuren von Erdnüssen, Fischen, glutenhaltigem Getreide, Krebstieren, Milch, Schalenfrüchten, Sellerie, Sesamsamen und Sojabohnen enthalten.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Rinderroulade or Klassischer Kartoffelsalat?

Overall, Rinderroulade has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Rinderroulade has fewer calories: 90 kcal versus 187 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Rinderroulade has less sugar: 0.8 g versus 2.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons