SPAM Fully Cooked Luncheon Meat vs Hash
Overall, Hash has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | SPAM Fully Cooked Luncheon M... | Hash |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 327 kcal | 140 kcal |
| Fat | 29.1 g | 8.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 10.9 g | 1.1 g |
| Sugars | 1.8 g | 0.4 g |
| Salt | 5.7 g | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.9 g |
| Protein | 12.7 g | 7.2 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | Pork | Beef |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Hash has 57% fewer calories (140 kcal vs 327 kcal).
- Hash has 72% less fat (8.1 g vs 29.1 g).
- Hash has 90% less saturated fat (1.1 g vs 10.9 g).
- Hash has 77% less sugar (0.4 g vs 1.8 g).
- Hash has 88% less salt (0.7 g vs 5.7 g).
- SPAM Fully Cooked Luncheon Meat has 43% more protein (12.7 g vs 7.2 g).
- Hash has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only SPAM Fully Cooked Luncheon Meat lists: Pork.
- Only Hash lists: Beef.
Ingredients
SPAM Fully Cooked Luncheon Meat
pork, water, modified potato starch, salt, sugar, sodium nitrite
Hash
beef, rehydrated potatoes, water, contains 2% or less of salt, flavoring, potassium chloride, sugar, spices, sodium nitrite.
FAQ
Which is healthier: SPAM Fully Cooked Luncheon Meat or Hash?
Overall, Hash has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Hash has fewer calories: 140 kcal versus 327 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Hash has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 1.8 g per 100 g.