Spam 25% Less Sodium vs Noix d'épaule cuite choix Désossée
Overall, Noix d'épaule cuite choix Désossée has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Spam 25% Less Sodium | Noix d'épaule cuite choix Dé... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 314 kcal | 177 kcal |
| Fat | 28.6 g | 12 g |
| Saturated fat | 10.7 g | 4.8 g |
| Sugars | 1.8 g | 0.2 g |
| Salt | 2.5 g | 2.5 g |
| Protein | 12.5 g | 17 g |
| Additives | 1 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Noix d'épaule cuite choix Désossée has 44% fewer calories (177 kcal vs 314 kcal).
- Noix d'épaule cuite choix Désossée has 58% less fat (12 g vs 28.6 g).
- Noix d'épaule cuite choix Désossée has 55% less saturated fat (4.8 g vs 10.7 g).
- Noix d'épaule cuite choix Désossée has 89% less sugar (0.2 g vs 1.8 g).
- Noix d'épaule cuite choix Désossée has 26% more protein (17 g vs 12.5 g).
- Noix d'épaule cuite choix Désossée has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Spam 25% Less Sodium
Pork with Ham, Mechanically Separated Chicken, Water, Salt, Modified Potato Starch, Sugar, Sodium Phosphates, Potassium Chloride, Sodium Nitrite
Noix d'épaule cuite choix Désossée
Porc (85%), eau, sel, gélatine, dextrose, antioxydant (ascorbate de sodium), conservateur (nitrite de sodium).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Spam 25% Less Sodium or Noix d'épaule cuite choix Désossée?
Overall, Noix d'épaule cuite choix Désossée has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Noix d'épaule cuite choix Désossée has fewer calories: 177 kcal versus 314 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Noix d'épaule cuite choix Désossée has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 1.8 g per 100 g.