Sour Cream vs Mild Salsa
Overall, Mild Salsa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sour Cream | Mild Salsa |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 201 kcal | 64 kcal |
| Fat | 18 g | 0.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 2.4 g | 3.4 g |
| Salt | 0.6 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 1.2 g |
| Protein | 1.1 g | 1.1 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Mild Salsa has 68% fewer calories (64 kcal vs 201 kcal).
- Mild Salsa has 96% less fat (0.7 g vs 18 g).
- Mild Salsa has 94% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 3.1 g).
- Sour Cream has 29% less sugar (2.4 g vs 3.4 g).
- Mild Salsa has 58% more fiber (1.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Mild Salsa has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Sour Cream lists: Eggs, Milk.
Ingredients
Sour Cream
Eau,huile de colza,crème acidulée (9%) (LAIT),amidon de maïs modifié (dont sirop de glucose),crème fraîche épaisse (LAIT) (2,9%),poudre de petit-LAIT,LAIT entier en poudre,crème en poudre (LAIT),oignons,vinaigre de vin blanc,ciboulette,poudre de jaune d'ŒUF,sel,purée d'ail,correcteur d'acidité (acide lactique),stabilisant (gomme xanthane),arôme,conservateur (sorbate do potassium)
Mild Salsa
Tomato (56%), Tomato Purée, Onion (10%), Green Pepper (7%), Modified Maize Starch, Spirit Vinegar, Salt, Coriander Leaf, Garlic Purée, Jalapeño Chilli, Chilli Powder, Cumin, Black Pepper.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sour Cream or Mild Salsa?
Overall, Mild Salsa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Mild Salsa has fewer calories: 64 kcal versus 201 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sour Cream has less sugar: 2.4 g versus 3.4 g per 100 g.