Comparison

Soupe marocaine vs Mushroom Soy Sauce

Overall, Soupe marocaine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 ml

NutrientSoupe marocaineMushroom Soy Sauce
Nutri-Score a e
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 35 kcal 61 kcal
Fat 0 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 2.8 g 2.2 g
Salt 0.4 g 16.9 g
Fiber 1.7 g 0 g
Protein 1.7 g 4.8 g
Additives04
AllergensCeleryGluten, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Soupe marocaine has 43% fewer calories (35 kcal vs 61 kcal).
  • Mushroom Soy Sauce has 21% less sugar (2.2 g vs 2.8 g).
  • Soupe marocaine has 98% less salt (0.4 g vs 16.9 g).
  • Soupe marocaine has 100% more fiber (1.7 g vs 0 g).
  • Mushroom Soy Sauce has 65% more protein (4.8 g vs 1.7 g).
  • Soupe marocaine has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Soupe marocaine is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Soupe marocaine lists: Celery.
  • Only Mushroom Soy Sauce lists: Gluten, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Soupe marocaine

Eau pure du parc régional du Haut - Languedoc, courgettes (16%), céleri (10%), oignons* (1o%), tomates* (8% | orig. France), pois chíches* (5% | orig. Sud - Ouest), abricots* (3%), sel de Guérande garanti Nature d Progrès, coriandre*, cumin*, huile d'olive première pression à froid*.

Mushroom Soy Sauce

Eau, Soja, Farine De Blé, sel, sucre, colorant (E150c), glutamate Monosodique(E621), Gomme Xanthane (E415), Saveur Champignon, Benzoate De Sodium(E211).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Soupe marocaine or Mushroom Soy Sauce?

Overall, Soupe marocaine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Soupe marocaine has fewer calories: 35 kcal versus 61 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Mushroom Soy Sauce has less sugar: 2.2 g versus 2.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons