Sonora style flour tortillas vs Essbare Trinkhalme
Overall, Essbare Trinkhalme has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.
Sonora style flour tortillas
Essbare Trinkhalme
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sonora style flour tortillas | Essbare Trinkhalme |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 350 kcal | 312 kcal |
| Fat | 15 g | 2.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 5 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 2.5 g | 1.3 g |
| Salt | 1.9 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 5 g | 5 g |
| Protein | 7.5 g | 20 g |
| Additives | 11 | 3 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Soybeans | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Essbare Trinkhalme has 11% fewer calories (312 kcal vs 350 kcal).
- Essbare Trinkhalme has 85% less fat (2.3 g vs 15 g).
- Essbare Trinkhalme has 90% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 5 g).
- Essbare Trinkhalme has 48% less sugar (1.3 g vs 2.5 g).
- Essbare Trinkhalme has 99% less salt (0 g vs 1.9 g).
- Essbare Trinkhalme has 63% more protein (20 g vs 7.5 g).
- Essbare Trinkhalme has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Sonora style flour tortillas lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Sonora style flour tortillas
ENRICHED BLEACHED FLOUR (WHEAT FLOUR, NIACIN, REDUCED IRON, THIAMINE MONONITRATE, RIBOFLAVIN, FOLIC ACID), WATER, VEGETABLE SHORTENING AND MARGARINE BLEND (INTERESTERIFIED SOYBEAN OIL, HYDROGENATED SOYBEAN OIL, COTTONSEED OIL), MONO-AND DIGLYCERIDES, SOY LECITHIN, ARTIFICIAL FLAVOR, BETA-CAROTENE (COLOR), VITAMIN A PALMITATE, SALT, SUGAR, CELLULOSE GUM, SODIUM ACID PYROPHOSPHATE, ENZYMES, BAKING SODA, FUMARIC ACID, CALCIUM PROPIONATE, SORBIC ACID. CONTAINS: WHEAT, SOY.
Essbare Trinkhalme
Hartweizengrieß, Weizengluten, Apfelfaser, Säuerungsmittel: Citronensäure; Maltodextrin, natürliches Aroma, Farbstoff: Pflanzenkohle; Süßungsmittel: Steviolglycoside
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sonora style flour tortillas or Essbare Trinkhalme?
Overall, Essbare Trinkhalme has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Essbare Trinkhalme has fewer calories: 312 kcal versus 350 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Essbare Trinkhalme has less sugar: 1.3 g versus 2.5 g per 100 g.