Die essbare Tasse, Schoko vs Essbare Trinkhalme
Overall, Essbare Trinkhalme has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.
Die essbare Tasse, Schoko
Essbare Trinkhalme
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Die essbare Tasse, Schoko | Essbare Trinkhalme |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 452 kcal | 312 kcal |
| Fat | 17.8 g | 2.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 7.9 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 11 g | 1.3 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 5 g |
| Protein | 8.3 g | 20 g |
| Additives | 0 | 3 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Gluten, Soybeans, El | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Essbare Trinkhalme has 31% fewer calories (312 kcal vs 452 kcal).
- Essbare Trinkhalme has 87% less fat (2.3 g vs 17.8 g).
- Essbare Trinkhalme has 94% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 7.9 g).
- Essbare Trinkhalme has 88% less sugar (1.3 g vs 11 g).
- Essbare Trinkhalme has 99% less salt (0 g vs 1 g).
- Essbare Trinkhalme has 58% more protein (20 g vs 8.3 g).
- Essbare Trinkhalme has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Die essbare Tasse, Schoko lists: Eggs, Soybeans, El.
Ingredients
Die essbare Tasse, Schoko
_Weizenmehl_, Pflanzenöl (Dattel, _Soja_, Raps), Zucker, _Ei_, Invertzuckersirup, Kakao, Salz.
Essbare Trinkhalme
Hartweizengrieß, Weizengluten, Apfelfaser, Säuerungsmittel: Citronensäure; Maltodextrin, natürliches Aroma, Farbstoff: Pflanzenkohle; Süßungsmittel: Steviolglycoside
FAQ
Which is healthier: Die essbare Tasse, Schoko or Essbare Trinkhalme?
Overall, Essbare Trinkhalme has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Essbare Trinkhalme has fewer calories: 312 kcal versus 452 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Essbare Trinkhalme has less sugar: 1.3 g versus 11 g per 100 g.