Die essbare Tasse, Schoko vs Superhalm
Overall, Superhalm has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Die essbare Tasse, Schoko | Superhalm |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 452 kcal | 339 kcal |
| Fat | 17.8 g | 1.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 7.9 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 11 g | 1.3 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 5.8 g |
| Protein | 8.3 g | 20.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 3 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Gluten, Soybeans, El | Eggs, Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Superhalm has 25% fewer calories (339 kcal vs 452 kcal).
- Superhalm has 90% less fat (1.8 g vs 17.8 g).
- Superhalm has 95% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 7.9 g).
- Superhalm has 88% less sugar (1.3 g vs 11 g).
- Superhalm has 97% less salt (0 g vs 1 g).
- Superhalm has 59% more protein (20.1 g vs 8.3 g).
- Superhalm has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Die essbare Tasse, Schoko lists: Soybeans, El.
Ingredients
Die essbare Tasse, Schoko
_Weizenmehl_, Pflanzenöl (Dattel, _Soja_, Raps), Zucker, _Ei_, Invertzuckersirup, Kakao, Salz.
Superhalm
Hartweizengrieß, Weizengluten, Apfelfasern, Säuerungsmittel (Zitronensäure), Maltodextrin, natürliches Aroma, Farbstoff (Pflanzenkohle), Süßungsmittel (Steviolglycoside)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Die essbare Tasse, Schoko or Superhalm?
Overall, Superhalm has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Superhalm has fewer calories: 339 kcal versus 452 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Superhalm has less sugar: 1.3 g versus 11 g per 100 g.