Comparison

Wicked Elphaba Caramel Apple vs Superhalm

Overall, Superhalm has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientWicked Elphaba Caramel AppleSuperhalm
Nutri-Score d a
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 389 kcal 339 kcal
Fat 4.2 g 1.8 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0.4 g
Sugars 30.6 g 1.3 g
Salt 1.2 g 0 g
Fiber 5.6 g 5.8 g
Protein 5.6 g 20.1 g
Additives33
AllergensNone listedEggs, Gluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Superhalm has 13% fewer calories (339 kcal vs 389 kcal).
  • Superhalm has 57% less fat (1.8 g vs 4.2 g).
  • Wicked Elphaba Caramel Apple has no saturated fat, while Superhalm has 0.4 g.
  • Superhalm has 96% less sugar (1.3 g vs 30.6 g).
  • Superhalm has 97% less salt (0 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Superhalm has 72% more protein (20.1 g vs 5.6 g).
  • Superhalm has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Superhalm lists: Eggs, Gluten.

Ingredients

Wicked Elphaba Caramel Apple

Whole Grain Corn, Sugar, Corn Meal, Corn Syrup, Canola Oil, Sunflower Oil, Salt, Turmeric, Blue 1, Baking Soda, Natural Flavor, Artificial Flavor, Calcium Carbonate, Vitamin C, Iron, Zinc, Niacinamide, Vitamin B6, Thiamin Mononitrate, Vitamin A, Riboflavin, Folic Acid, Vitamin B12, Vitamin D3. May contain wheat ingredients.

Superhalm

Hartweizengrieß, Weizengluten, Apfelfasern, Säuerungsmittel (Zitronensäure), Maltodextrin, natürliches Aroma, Farbstoff (Pflanzenkohle), Süßungsmittel (Steviolglycoside)

FAQ

Which is healthier: Wicked Elphaba Caramel Apple or Superhalm?

Overall, Superhalm has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Superhalm has fewer calories: 339 kcal versus 389 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Superhalm has less sugar: 1.3 g versus 30.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons