Italian Recipe Snack Tray vs Superhalm
Overall, Superhalm has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Italian Recipe Snack Tray | Superhalm |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 318 kcal | 339 kcal |
| Fat | 16.5 g | 1.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 8.2 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 1.2 g | 1.3 g |
| Salt | 3.2 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.2 g | 5.8 g |
| Protein | 21.2 g | 20.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 3 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Milk, Soybeans | Eggs, Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Superhalm has 89% less fat (1.8 g vs 16.5 g).
- Superhalm has 95% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 8.2 g).
- Superhalm has 99% less salt (0 g vs 3.2 g).
- Superhalm has 80% more fiber (5.8 g vs 1.2 g).
- Superhalm has the better Nutri-Score.
- Italian Recipe Snack Tray is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Italian Recipe Snack Tray lists: Milk, Soybeans.
- Only Superhalm lists: Eggs.
Ingredients
Italian Recipe Snack Tray
PORK MEAT, SALT, CULTURED PASTEURIZED MILK, SALT, ENZYMES, UNBLEACHED AND UNBROMATED WHEAT FLOUR, WATER, SOYBEAN OIL, SOYBEAN VEGETABLE SHORTENING, MALT, PURIFIED SEA SALT, YEAST.
Superhalm
Hartweizengrieß, Weizengluten, Apfelfasern, Säuerungsmittel (Zitronensäure), Maltodextrin, natürliches Aroma, Farbstoff (Pflanzenkohle), Süßungsmittel (Steviolglycoside)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Italian Recipe Snack Tray or Superhalm?
Overall, Superhalm has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Italian Recipe Snack Tray has fewer calories: 318 kcal versus 339 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Italian Recipe Snack Tray has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 1.3 g per 100 g.