Italian Recipe Snack Tray vs Essbare Trinkhalme
Overall, Essbare Trinkhalme has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Italian Recipe Snack Tray
Essbare Trinkhalme
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Italian Recipe Snack Tray | Essbare Trinkhalme |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 318 kcal | 312 kcal |
| Fat | 16.5 g | 2.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 8.2 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 1.2 g | 1.3 g |
| Salt | 3.2 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.2 g | 5 g |
| Protein | 21.2 g | 20 g |
| Additives | 0 | 3 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Milk, Soybeans | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Essbare Trinkhalme has 86% less fat (2.3 g vs 16.5 g).
- Essbare Trinkhalme has 94% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 8.2 g).
- Essbare Trinkhalme has 100% less salt (0 g vs 3.2 g).
- Essbare Trinkhalme has 76% more fiber (5 g vs 1.2 g).
- Essbare Trinkhalme has the better Nutri-Score.
- Italian Recipe Snack Tray is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Italian Recipe Snack Tray lists: Milk, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Italian Recipe Snack Tray
PORK MEAT, SALT, CULTURED PASTEURIZED MILK, SALT, ENZYMES, UNBLEACHED AND UNBROMATED WHEAT FLOUR, WATER, SOYBEAN OIL, SOYBEAN VEGETABLE SHORTENING, MALT, PURIFIED SEA SALT, YEAST.
Essbare Trinkhalme
Hartweizengrieß, Weizengluten, Apfelfaser, Säuerungsmittel: Citronensäure; Maltodextrin, natürliches Aroma, Farbstoff: Pflanzenkohle; Süßungsmittel: Steviolglycoside
FAQ
Which is healthier: Italian Recipe Snack Tray or Essbare Trinkhalme?
Overall, Essbare Trinkhalme has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Essbare Trinkhalme has fewer calories: 312 kcal versus 318 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Italian Recipe Snack Tray has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 1.3 g per 100 g.