Wicked Elphaba Caramel Apple vs Essbare Trinkhalme
Overall, Essbare Trinkhalme has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.
Wicked Elphaba Caramel Apple
Essbare Trinkhalme
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Wicked Elphaba Caramel Apple | Essbare Trinkhalme |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 389 kcal | 312 kcal |
| Fat | 4.2 g | 2.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 30.6 g | 1.3 g |
| Salt | 1.2 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 5.6 g | 5 g |
| Protein | 5.6 g | 20 g |
| Additives | 3 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Essbare Trinkhalme has 20% fewer calories (312 kcal vs 389 kcal).
- Essbare Trinkhalme has 45% less fat (2.3 g vs 4.2 g).
- Wicked Elphaba Caramel Apple has no saturated fat, while Essbare Trinkhalme has 0.5 g.
- Essbare Trinkhalme has 96% less sugar (1.3 g vs 30.6 g).
- Essbare Trinkhalme has 99% less salt (0 g vs 1.2 g).
- Wicked Elphaba Caramel Apple has 10% more fiber (5.6 g vs 5 g).
- Essbare Trinkhalme has 72% more protein (20 g vs 5.6 g).
- Essbare Trinkhalme has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Essbare Trinkhalme lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Wicked Elphaba Caramel Apple
Whole Grain Corn, Sugar, Corn Meal, Corn Syrup, Canola Oil, Sunflower Oil, Salt, Turmeric, Blue 1, Baking Soda, Natural Flavor, Artificial Flavor, Calcium Carbonate, Vitamin C, Iron, Zinc, Niacinamide, Vitamin B6, Thiamin Mononitrate, Vitamin A, Riboflavin, Folic Acid, Vitamin B12, Vitamin D3. May contain wheat ingredients.
Essbare Trinkhalme
Hartweizengrieß, Weizengluten, Apfelfaser, Säuerungsmittel: Citronensäure; Maltodextrin, natürliches Aroma, Farbstoff: Pflanzenkohle; Süßungsmittel: Steviolglycoside
FAQ
Which is healthier: Wicked Elphaba Caramel Apple or Essbare Trinkhalme?
Overall, Essbare Trinkhalme has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Essbare Trinkhalme has fewer calories: 312 kcal versus 389 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Essbare Trinkhalme has less sugar: 1.3 g versus 30.6 g per 100 g.