Collagen Complete vs Essbare Trinkhalme
Overall, Collagen Complete has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Collagen Complete
Essbare Trinkhalme
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Collagen Complete | Essbare Trinkhalme |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 359 kcal | 312 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 2.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 1.3 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 5 g |
| Protein | 87.7 g | 20 g |
| Additives | 0 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Essbare Trinkhalme has 13% fewer calories (312 kcal vs 359 kcal).
- Collagen Complete has no fat, while Essbare Trinkhalme has 2.3 g.
- Collagen Complete has no saturated fat, while Essbare Trinkhalme has 0.5 g.
- Collagen Complete has no sugar, while Essbare Trinkhalme has 1.3 g.
- Essbare Trinkhalme has 98% less salt (0 g vs 0.5 g).
- Essbare Trinkhalme has 100% more fiber (5 g vs 0 g).
- Collagen Complete has 77% more protein (87.7 g vs 20 g).
- Only Essbare Trinkhalme lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Collagen Complete
Hydrolyzed collagen (pasture-raised type I, II, III collagens)
Essbare Trinkhalme
Hartweizengrieß, Weizengluten, Apfelfaser, Säuerungsmittel: Citronensäure; Maltodextrin, natürliches Aroma, Farbstoff: Pflanzenkohle; Süßungsmittel: Steviolglycoside
FAQ
Which is healthier: Collagen Complete or Essbare Trinkhalme?
Overall, Collagen Complete has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Essbare Trinkhalme has fewer calories: 312 kcal versus 359 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Collagen Complete has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.3 g per 100 g.