Comparison

Smokehouse BBQ vs Salted crunchy edamame

Overall, Smokehouse BBQ has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSmokehouse BBQSalted crunchy edamame
Nutri-Score b c
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 413 kcal 413 kcal
Fat 12 g 18.4 g
Saturated fat 1.3 g 3 g
Sugars 3.7 g 5.3 g
Salt 0.8 g 1.5 g
Fiber 12.3 g 22.5 g
Protein 10.7 g 38.2 g
Additives20
AllergensSoybeansSoybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Smokehouse BBQ has 35% less fat (12 g vs 18.4 g).
  • Smokehouse BBQ has 56% less saturated fat (1.3 g vs 3 g).
  • Smokehouse BBQ has 31% less sugar (3.7 g vs 5.3 g).
  • Smokehouse BBQ has 46% less salt (0.8 g vs 1.5 g).
  • Salted crunchy edamame has 45% more fiber (22.5 g vs 12.3 g).
  • Salted crunchy edamame has 72% more protein (38.2 g vs 10.7 g).
  • Smokehouse BBQ has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Salted crunchy edamame is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Smokehouse BBQ

CORN KERNELS (26%), DRIED GREEN PEAS (26%), CORN (19%), Sunflower Oil, Corn Starch, Modified Corn Starch, Sugar, Salt, Flavourings, Yeast, Maltodextrin, Garlic Extract, Black Pepper, Garlic Powder, Tomato Powder, Oregano, Paprika Powder, Smoked Paprika Powder, Yeast Extract Powder, Colour: Paprika Extract, Apple Cider Vinegar Powder, Yeast Extract, Onion Powder, Chilli Powder, Acid: Citric Acid.

Salted crunchy edamame

97% graines edamame (soja), 1.3% sel, huile de tournesol

FAQ

Which is healthier: Smokehouse BBQ or Salted crunchy edamame?

Overall, Smokehouse BBQ has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Salted crunchy edamame has fewer calories: 413 kcal versus 413 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Smokehouse BBQ has less sugar: 3.7 g versus 5.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons