Comparison

Smalczyk z tofu z cebulką vs Paté de tofu brusinky

Overall, Paté de tofu brusinky has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSmalczyk z tofu z cebulkąPaté de tofu brusinky
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 340 kcal 275 kcal
Fat 22 g 23 g
Saturated fat 2.1 g 1.9 g
Sugars 0.5 g 5 g
Salt 1.2 g 1.3 g
Fiber 1.3 g 3.4 g
Protein 7 g 6.8 g
Additives00
AllergensGluten, SoybeansGluten, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Paté de tofu brusinky has 19% fewer calories (275 kcal vs 340 kcal).
  • Smalczyk z tofu z cebulką has 90% less sugar (0.5 g vs 5 g).
  • Paté de tofu brusinky has 62% more fiber (3.4 g vs 1.3 g).

Ingredients

Smalczyk z tofu z cebulką

38 % Tofu (nasiona _soi_, woda), woda, olej rzepakowy, 10% cebula smażona (cebula, olej rzepakowy, mąka _pszenna_, sól), drożdże suszone, modyfikowana skrobia kukurydziana, sól, sos _sojowy_ (woda, nasiona _soi_, nasiona pszenicy (bez glutenu), sól), ocet jabłkowy. Może zawierać nasiona sezamu i gorczycy.

Paté de tofu brusinky

voda, Tofu 22 % (sója, voda), řepkový olej, okara (voda, sója), brusinky 6%, cibule, sójová omáčka (voda, sója, pšenice, sůl), kukuřičný škrob, sušené žampiony, miso pasta (rýže, sója, mořská sůl, fermentační kultury), droždí, hrachová vláknina, pšeničná mouka, sůl, kvasnicový extrakt, česnek, koření, bylinky, glukóza.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Smalczyk z tofu z cebulką or Paté de tofu brusinky?

Overall, Paté de tofu brusinky has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Paté de tofu brusinky has fewer calories: 275 kcal versus 340 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Smalczyk z tofu z cebulką has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons