Skyr Lit au caramel vs Yogur tipo Grego Natural Light
Overall, Skyr Lit au caramel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Skyr Lit au caramel | Yogur tipo Grego Natural Lig... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 76 kcal | 58 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 1.3 g |
| Sugars | 9.4 g | 4.2 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Protein | 7.8 g | 5.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Yogur tipo Grego Natural Light has 24% fewer calories (58 kcal vs 76 kcal).
- Skyr Lit au caramel has 75% less fat (0.5 g vs 2 g).
- Skyr Lit au caramel has 85% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 1.3 g).
- Yogur tipo Grego Natural Light has 55% less sugar (4.2 g vs 9.4 g).
- Skyr Lit au caramel has 26% more protein (7.8 g vs 5.8 g).
Ingredients
Skyr Lit au caramel
Recette au yaourt nature sur lit au caramel, aromatisée. Ingrédients : Yaourt maigre (Lait) - Eau - Sucre 4,1% - Caramel au beurre salé 2,7% (Sucre - Lait concentré sucré - Beurre salé - Crème - Sel) - Amidon de maïs - Caramel 0,9% (Sucre - Sirop de glucose-fructose) - Jus de citron à base de concentré - Arôme naturel.
Yogur tipo Grego Natural Light
VALORES NUTRICIONALES medios por 100 g VALORES NUTRICIONAIS médios por 100 g Valor energético/Energia 1244 kJ (
FAQ
Which is healthier: Skyr Lit au caramel or Yogur tipo Grego Natural Light?
Overall, Skyr Lit au caramel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Yogur tipo Grego Natural Light has fewer calories: 58 kcal versus 76 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Yogur tipo Grego Natural Light has less sugar: 4.2 g versus 9.4 g per 100 g.