Shirataki de Konjac vs Kichererbsennudeln
Overall, Shirataki de Konjac has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Shirataki de Konjac | Kichererbsennudeln |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 7 kcal | 364 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 6.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 1.6 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 2.3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 3.7 g | 8.7 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 22 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Shirataki de Konjac has 98% fewer calories (7 kcal vs 364 kcal).
- Shirataki de Konjac has no fat, while Kichererbsennudeln has 6.1 g.
- Shirataki de Konjac has no saturated fat, while Kichererbsennudeln has 1.6 g.
- Shirataki de Konjac has no sugar, while Kichererbsennudeln has 2.3 g.
- Kichererbsennudeln has 57% more fiber (8.7 g vs 3.7 g).
- Kichererbsennudeln has 100% more protein (22 g vs 0 g).
- Only Shirataki de Konjac lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Shirataki de Konjac
Eau, farine de konjac 4%, correcteur d'acidité: acide citrique.
Kichererbsennudeln
Kichererbsenmehl, Kann Spuren von Ei und Soja enthalten,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Shirataki de Konjac or Kichererbsennudeln?
Overall, Shirataki de Konjac has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Shirataki de Konjac has fewer calories: 7 kcal versus 364 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Shirataki de Konjac has less sugar: 0 g versus 2.3 g per 100 g.