Shirataki de Konjac vs Konjac Noodles
Overall, Shirataki de Konjac has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Shirataki de Konjac | Konjac Noodles |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | — |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 7 kcal | 20 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | — |
| Fiber | 3.7 g | 2.9 g |
| Protein | 0 g | — |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Shirataki de Konjac has 65% fewer calories (7 kcal vs 20 kcal).
- Shirataki de Konjac has 22% more fiber (3.7 g vs 2.9 g).
- Only Shirataki de Konjac lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Shirataki de Konjac
Eau, farine de konjac 4%, correcteur d'acidité: acide citrique.
Konjac Noodles
water, 3,84% konjac root meal, firming agent: calcium hydroxide,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Shirataki de Konjac or Konjac Noodles?
Overall, Shirataki de Konjac has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Shirataki de Konjac has fewer calories: 7 kcal versus 20 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Shirataki de Konjac has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.