Comparison

Shirataki de Konjac vs Fusilli sans gluten , 400g

Overall, Shirataki de Konjac has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientShirataki de KonjacFusilli sans gluten , 400g
Nutri-Score a c
NOVA group 1 4
Calories 7 kcal 359 kcal
Fat 0 g 1.5 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0.3 g
Sugars 0 g 0.6 g
Salt 0 g 0.2 g
Fiber 3.7 g 2 g
Protein 0 g 6.5 g
Additives11
AllergensSulphur dioxide and sulphitesNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Shirataki de Konjac has 98% fewer calories (7 kcal vs 359 kcal).
  • Shirataki de Konjac has no fat, while Fusilli sans gluten , 400g has 1.5 g.
  • Shirataki de Konjac has no saturated fat, while Fusilli sans gluten , 400g has 0.3 g.
  • Shirataki de Konjac has no sugar, while Fusilli sans gluten , 400g has 0.6 g.
  • Shirataki de Konjac has 46% more fiber (3.7 g vs 2 g).
  • Fusilli sans gluten , 400g has 100% more protein (6.5 g vs 0 g).
  • Shirataki de Konjac has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Shirataki de Konjac is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Shirataki de Konjac lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.

Ingredients

Shirataki de Konjac

Eau, farine de konjac 4%, correcteur d'acidité: acide citrique.

Fusilli sans gluten , 400g

Farine de maïs blanc 61%, farine de maïs jaune 33%, farine de riz 4,8%, eau, émulsifiant : mono et diglycérides d'acides gras. Traces éventuelles de soja.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Shirataki de Konjac or Fusilli sans gluten , 400g?

Overall, Shirataki de Konjac has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Shirataki de Konjac has fewer calories: 7 kcal versus 359 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Shirataki de Konjac has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons