Self Raising Flour vs Harina de trigo integral
Overall, Harina de trigo integral has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Self Raising Flour | Harina de trigo integral |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 346 kcal | 328 kcal |
| Fat | 1.2 g | 2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 2.3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 3 g | 11 g |
| Protein | 9.4 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Self Raising Flour has 40% less fat (1.2 g vs 2 g).
- Self Raising Flour has 57% less sugar (1 g vs 2.3 g).
- Harina de trigo integral has 73% more fiber (11 g vs 3 g).
- Harina de trigo integral has 22% more protein (12 g vs 9.4 g).
- Harina de trigo integral has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Self Raising Flour lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Self Raising Flour
wheat flour (wheat flour, calcium carbonate, iron, niacin, thiamin), raising agents: sodium ,carbonates, calcium phosphate
Harina de trigo integral
Harina integral de trigo
FAQ
Which is healthier: Self Raising Flour or Harina de trigo integral?
Overall, Harina de trigo integral has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Harina de trigo integral has fewer calories: 328 kcal versus 346 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Self Raising Flour has less sugar: 1 g versus 2.3 g per 100 g.