Secco vs ZERO Secco
Overall, Secco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Secco | ZERO Secco |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 7 kcal | 31 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 1.1 g | 6.6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 3 | 2 |
| Allergens | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Secco has 77% fewer calories (7 kcal vs 31 kcal).
- Secco has 83% less sugar (1.1 g vs 6.6 g).
Ingredients
Secco
Trauben, konzentrierter Traubenmost, Säureregulatoren (Apfelsäure), Konservierungsstoffe (Sulfite), Stabilisatoren (Gummi arabicum), Stabilisatoren (Metaweinsäure)
ZERO Secco
Entalkoholisierter Wein (Trauben, rektifiziertes Traubenmostkonzentrat), Kohlensäure, Konservierungsstoff: E 242, Sulfite
FAQ
Which is healthier: Secco or ZERO Secco?
Overall, Secco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Secco has fewer calories: 7 kcal versus 31 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Secco has less sugar: 1.1 g versus 6.6 g per 100 g.