ZERO Secco vs Valdobbiadene Prosecco Superiore
Overall, Valdobbiadene Prosecco Superiore has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | ZERO Secco | Valdobbiadene Prosecco Super... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 31 kcal | 6 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 6.6 g | 1.5 g |
| Salt | — | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.9 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 2 | 2 |
| Allergens | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Valdobbiadene Prosecco Superiore has 81% fewer calories (6 kcal vs 31 kcal).
- Valdobbiadene Prosecco Superiore has 77% less sugar (1.5 g vs 6.6 g).
- Valdobbiadene Prosecco Superiore is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
ZERO Secco
Entalkoholisierter Wein (Trauben, rektifiziertes Traubenmostkonzentrat), Kohlensäure, Konservierungsstoff: E 242, Sulfite
Valdobbiadene Prosecco Superiore
Trauben, Saccharose, konzentrierter Traubenmost, Säureregulatoren(enthält Apfelsäure und/oder Weinsäure), Antioxidantien(L-Ascorbinsäure), Konservierungsstoffe(Sulfite), Stabilisatoren(Citronensäure)
FAQ
Which is healthier: ZERO Secco or Valdobbiadene Prosecco Superiore?
Overall, Valdobbiadene Prosecco Superiore has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Valdobbiadene Prosecco Superiore has fewer calories: 6 kcal versus 31 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Valdobbiadene Prosecco Superiore has less sugar: 1.5 g versus 6.6 g per 100 g.