ZERO Secco vs Processco
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | ZERO Secco | Processco |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 31 kcal | 66 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | — |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 6.6 g | 1.2 g |
| Protein | 0 g | — |
| Additives | 2 | 6 |
| Allergens | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- ZERO Secco has 53% fewer calories (31 kcal vs 66 kcal).
- Processco has 82% less sugar (1.2 g vs 6.6 g).
- Only ZERO Secco lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
ZERO Secco
Entalkoholisierter Wein (Trauben, rektifiziertes Traubenmostkonzentrat), Kohlensäure, Konservierungsstoff: E 242, Sulfite
Processco
Grapes, Tirage Liqueur, Acidity Regulators (Tartaric Acid, Citric Acid, Malic Acid), Preservatives (Potassium Bisulphite, Potassium Metabisulphite), Packaging Gas (Nitrogen).
FAQ
Which is healthier: ZERO Secco or Processco?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
ZERO Secco has fewer calories: 31 kcal versus 66 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Processco has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 6.6 g per 100 g.