Comparison

Processco vs Valdobbiadene Prosecco Superiore

Overall, Valdobbiadene Prosecco Superiore has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 ml

NutrientProcesscoValdobbiadene Prosecco Super...
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 66 kcal 6 kcal
Fat — 0 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 1.2 g 1.5 g
Salt — 0 g
Fiber — 0.9 g
Protein — 0 g
Additives62
AllergensNone listedSulphur dioxide and sulphites

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Valdobbiadene Prosecco Superiore has 91% fewer calories (6 kcal vs 66 kcal).
  • Processco has 20% less sugar (1.2 g vs 1.5 g).
  • Valdobbiadene Prosecco Superiore is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Valdobbiadene Prosecco Superiore lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.

Ingredients

Processco

Grapes, Tirage Liqueur, Acidity Regulators (Tartaric Acid, Citric Acid, Malic Acid), Preservatives (Potassium Bisulphite, Potassium Metabisulphite), Packaging Gas (Nitrogen).

Valdobbiadene Prosecco Superiore

Trauben, Saccharose, konzentrierter Traubenmost, Säureregulatoren(enthält Apfelsäure und/oder Weinsäure), Antioxidantien(L-Ascorbinsäure), Konservierungsstoffe(Sulfite), Stabilisatoren(Citronensäure)

FAQ

Which is healthier: Processco or Valdobbiadene Prosecco Superiore?

Overall, Valdobbiadene Prosecco Superiore has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Valdobbiadene Prosecco Superiore has fewer calories: 6 kcal versus 66 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Processco has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons