Secco vs Valdobbiadene Prosecco Superiore
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Secco | Valdobbiadene Prosecco Super... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 7 kcal | 6 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 1.1 g | 1.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.9 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 3 | 2 |
| Allergens | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Secco has 27% less sugar (1.1 g vs 1.5 g).
- Valdobbiadene Prosecco Superiore is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Secco
Trauben, konzentrierter Traubenmost, Säureregulatoren (Apfelsäure), Konservierungsstoffe (Sulfite), Stabilisatoren (Gummi arabicum), Stabilisatoren (Metaweinsäure)
Valdobbiadene Prosecco Superiore
Trauben, Saccharose, konzentrierter Traubenmost, Säureregulatoren(enthält Apfelsäure und/oder Weinsäure), Antioxidantien(L-Ascorbinsäure), Konservierungsstoffe(Sulfite), Stabilisatoren(Citronensäure)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Secco or Valdobbiadene Prosecco Superiore?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Valdobbiadene Prosecco Superiore has fewer calories: 6 kcal versus 7 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Secco has less sugar: 1.1 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.