Secco vs Prosecco doc extra dry
Overall, Secco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Secco | Prosecco doc extra dry |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 7 kcal | 130 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 10 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 1.1 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 10 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 10 g |
| Additives | 3 | 0 |
| Allergens | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Secco has 95% fewer calories (7 kcal vs 130 kcal).
- Secco has no fat, while Prosecco doc extra dry has 10 g.
- Prosecco doc extra dry has no sugar, while Secco has 1.1 g.
- Secco has no salt, while Prosecco doc extra dry has 10 g.
- Prosecco doc extra dry has 100% more protein (10 g vs 0 g).
- Only Secco lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Secco
Trauben, konzentrierter Traubenmost, Säureregulatoren (Apfelsäure), Konservierungsstoffe (Sulfite), Stabilisatoren (Gummi arabicum), Stabilisatoren (Metaweinsäure)
Prosecco doc extra dry
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Secco or Prosecco doc extra dry?
Overall, Secco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Secco has fewer calories: 7 kcal versus 130 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Prosecco doc extra dry has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.1 g per 100 g.