Secco vs Prosecco
Overall, Prosecco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Secco | Prosecco |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 7 kcal | 0 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 1.1 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 3 | 2 |
| Allergens | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Prosecco has no calories, while Secco has 7 kcal.
- Prosecco has no sugar, while Secco has 1.1 g.
- Only Secco lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Secco
Trauben, konzentrierter Traubenmost, Säureregulatoren (Apfelsäure), Konservierungsstoffe (Sulfite), Stabilisatoren (Gummi arabicum), Stabilisatoren (Metaweinsäure)
Prosecco
Grapes, Carbon dioxide, Preservative (Potassium metabisulphite)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Secco or Prosecco?
Overall, Prosecco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Prosecco has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 7 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Prosecco has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.1 g per 100 g.