Secco vs Prosecco DOC frizzante
Overall, Secco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Secco | Prosecco DOC frizzante |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 7 kcal | 8 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 1.1 g | 1.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 3 | 6 |
| Allergens | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Secco has 27% less sugar (1.1 g vs 1.5 g).
Ingredients
Secco
Trauben, konzentrierter Traubenmost, Säureregulatoren (Apfelsäure), Konservierungsstoffe (Sulfite), Stabilisatoren (Gummi arabicum), Stabilisatoren (Metaweinsäure)
Prosecco DOC frizzante
Uve, mosto di uve concentrato, gomma arabica, carbossimetilcellulosa, poliaspartato di potassio, acido fumarico, acido malico (D,L-/L-), acido tartarico (L(+)-), acido citrico, solfiti, acido L-ascorbico
FAQ
Which is healthier: Secco or Prosecco DOC frizzante?
Overall, Secco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Secco has fewer calories: 7 kcal versus 8 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Secco has less sugar: 1.1 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.