Secco vs Processco
Overall, Secco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Secco | Processco |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 7 kcal | 66 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | — |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 1.1 g | 1.2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0 g | — |
| Additives | 3 | 6 |
| Allergens | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Secco has 89% fewer calories (7 kcal vs 66 kcal).
- Only Secco lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Secco
Trauben, konzentrierter Traubenmost, Säureregulatoren (Apfelsäure), Konservierungsstoffe (Sulfite), Stabilisatoren (Gummi arabicum), Stabilisatoren (Metaweinsäure)
Processco
Grapes, Tirage Liqueur, Acidity Regulators (Tartaric Acid, Citric Acid, Malic Acid), Preservatives (Potassium Bisulphite, Potassium Metabisulphite), Packaging Gas (Nitrogen).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Secco or Processco?
Overall, Secco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Secco has fewer calories: 7 kcal versus 66 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Secco has less sugar: 1.1 g versus 1.2 g per 100 g.