Prosecco vs Valdobbiadene Prosecco Superiore
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Prosecco | Valdobbiadene Prosecco Super... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 0 kcal | 6 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 1.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.9 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 2 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Prosecco has no calories, while Valdobbiadene Prosecco Superiore has 6 kcal.
- Prosecco has no sugar, while Valdobbiadene Prosecco Superiore has 1.5 g.
- Valdobbiadene Prosecco Superiore has 100% more fiber (0.9 g vs 0 g).
- Valdobbiadene Prosecco Superiore is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Valdobbiadene Prosecco Superiore lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Prosecco
Grapes, Carbon dioxide, Preservative (Potassium metabisulphite)
Valdobbiadene Prosecco Superiore
Trauben, Saccharose, konzentrierter Traubenmost, Säureregulatoren(enthält Apfelsäure und/oder Weinsäure), Antioxidantien(L-Ascorbinsäure), Konservierungsstoffe(Sulfite), Stabilisatoren(Citronensäure)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Prosecco or Valdobbiadene Prosecco Superiore?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Prosecco has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 6 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Prosecco has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.