Comparison

Saumon ASC vs 2 Boneless Salmon Fillets

Overall, 2 Boneless Salmon Fillets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.

Saumon ASC

Saumon ASC

pas de marque · 250 g
a NOVA 1
Better choice
2 Boneless Salmon Fillets

2 Boneless Salmon Fillets

Tesco · 260g
a NOVA 1

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSaumon ASC2 Boneless Salmon Fillets
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 1 1
Calories 230 kcal 209 kcal
Fat 16 g 12 g
Saturated fat 2.2 g 1.6 g
Sugars 0 g 0 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.1 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 20 g 25.3 g
Additives00
AllergensFishFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • 2 Boneless Salmon Fillets has 25% less fat (12 g vs 16 g).
  • 2 Boneless Salmon Fillets has 27% less saturated fat (1.6 g vs 2.2 g).
  • 2 Boneless Salmon Fillets has 21% more protein (25.3 g vs 20 g).

Ingredients

Saumon ASC

100% pavés de _Saumon_

2 Boneless Salmon Fillets

salmon (fish).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Saumon ASC or 2 Boneless Salmon Fillets?

Overall, 2 Boneless Salmon Fillets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

2 Boneless Salmon Fillets has fewer calories: 209 kcal versus 230 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Saumon ASC has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Salmon fillet with skin vs 2 Boneless Salmon Fillet... Pavés de saumon Rose du... vs Saumon ASC Saumon ASC vs Purée de pommes de terre... Salmon fillet with skin vs Saumon ASC Saumon ASC vs Poke salmón Filet de saumon vs Saumon ASC Saumon ASC vs Wildlachsfilet Pavés de saumon Rose du... vs 2 Boneless Salmon Fillet...