Salmon fillet with skin vs Saumon ASC
Overall, Salmon fillet with skin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Salmon fillet with skin | Saumon ASC |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 204 kcal | 230 kcal |
| Fat | 12.8 g | 16 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.6 g | 2.2 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 22.2 g | 20 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Salmon fillet with skin has 11% fewer calories (204 kcal vs 230 kcal).
- Salmon fillet with skin has 20% less fat (12.8 g vs 16 g).
- Salmon fillet with skin has 27% less saturated fat (1.6 g vs 2.2 g).
Ingredients
Salmon fillet with skin
Fileti atlantskog lososa s kožom.
Saumon ASC
100% pavés de _Saumon_
FAQ
Which is healthier: Salmon fillet with skin or Saumon ASC?
Overall, Salmon fillet with skin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Salmon fillet with skin has fewer calories: 204 kcal versus 230 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Salmon fillet with skin has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.