Comparison
Saumon ASC vs Wildlachsfilet
Overall, Wildlachsfilet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Saumon ASC | Wildlachsfilet |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 230 kcal | 95 kcal |
| Fat | 16 g | 1.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.2 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 20 g | 20 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Wildlachsfilet has 59% fewer calories (95 kcal vs 230 kcal).
- Wildlachsfilet has 89% less fat (1.7 g vs 16 g).
- Wildlachsfilet has 82% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 2.2 g).
- Only Saumon ASC lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Saumon ASC
100% pavés de _Saumon_
Wildlachsfilet
Wildlachsfilet
FAQ
Which is healthier: Saumon ASC or Wildlachsfilet?
Overall, Wildlachsfilet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Wildlachsfilet has fewer calories: 95 kcal versus 230 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Saumon ASC has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.