Comparison
Sarrasin vs Buchweizen
Overall, Sarrasin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sarrasin | Buchweizen |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 339 kcal | 354 kcal |
| Fat | 3 g | 2.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.6 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 0.8 g | 1.3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 5.6 g | 4.4 g |
| Protein | 11.3 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Buchweizen has 13% less fat (2.6 g vs 3 g).
- Sarrasin has 38% less sugar (0.8 g vs 1.3 g).
- Sarrasin has 21% more fiber (5.6 g vs 4.4 g).
Ingredients
Sarrasin
buckwheat
Buchweizen
Buchweizen
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sarrasin or Buchweizen?
Overall, Sarrasin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sarrasin has fewer calories: 339 kcal versus 354 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sarrasin has less sugar: 0.8 g versus 1.3 g per 100 g.