Comparison
Sarrasin vs Bokhvete
Overall, Bokhvete has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sarrasin | Bokhvete |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 339 kcal | 340 kcal |
| Fat | 3 g | 2.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.6 g | 0.6 g |
| Sugars | 0.8 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 5.6 g | 7.4 g |
| Protein | 11.3 g | 12.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bokhvete has 24% more fiber (7.4 g vs 5.6 g).
- Bokhvete has 10% more protein (12.6 g vs 11.3 g).
- Bokhvete has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Sarrasin
buckwheat
Bokhvete
Buchweizen
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sarrasin or Bokhvete?
Overall, Bokhvete has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sarrasin has fewer calories: 339 kcal versus 340 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sarrasin has less sugar: 0.8 g versus 1 g per 100 g.