Salsifis à la béchamel vs Schwarzwurzeln geschnitten
Overall, Schwarzwurzeln geschnitten has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Salsifis à la béchamel | Schwarzwurzeln geschnitten |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 56 kcal | 29 kcal |
| Fat | 2.9 g | 1 g |
| Saturated fat | 2 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 2.3 g | 1.4 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | 2.3 g | — |
| Protein | 2.3 g | 3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Schwarzwurzeln geschnitten has 48% fewer calories (29 kcal vs 56 kcal).
- Schwarzwurzeln geschnitten has 66% less fat (1 g vs 2.9 g).
- Schwarzwurzeln geschnitten has no saturated fat, while Salsifis à la béchamel has 2 g.
- Schwarzwurzeln geschnitten has 39% less sugar (1.4 g vs 2.3 g).
- Schwarzwurzeln geschnitten has 23% more protein (3 g vs 2.3 g).
- Schwarzwurzeln geschnitten has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Salsifis à la béchamel lists: Gluten, Milk.
Ingredients
Salsifis à la béchamel
Salsifis 53%, lait demi-écremé, eau, huile végétal (hulle de palme, huile de tournesol), farine de blé, bouillon de légumes, sel, dextrose, levure, carotte, dignon, poireau, échalote, poivron, tomate), amidon de fiz, sel, jus de citron concentré, noix de muscade, poivre.
Schwarzwurzeln geschnitten
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Salsifis à la béchamel or Schwarzwurzeln geschnitten?
Overall, Schwarzwurzeln geschnitten has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Schwarzwurzeln geschnitten has fewer calories: 29 kcal versus 56 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Schwarzwurzeln geschnitten has less sugar: 1.4 g versus 2.3 g per 100 g.