Comparison

Salsiccia Lucania dolce vs Galbanetto

Overall, Galbanetto has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient	Salsiccia Lucania dolce	Galbanetto
Nutri-Score	—	e
NOVA group	3	—
Calories	315 kcal	305 kcal
Fat	23 g	21 g
Saturated fat	3.3 g	8 g
Sugars	0.3 g	0.5 g
Salt	4.8 g	2.7 g
Fiber	0 g	—
Protein	21.1 g	29 g
Additives	0	0
Allergens	None listed	None listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

Salsiccia Lucania dolce has 59% less saturated fat (3.3 g vs 8 g).
Galbanetto has 44% less salt (2.7 g vs 4.8 g).
Galbanetto has 27% more protein (29 g vs 21.1 g).

Ingredients

Salsiccia Lucania dolce

Carne di suino di origine Italiana, sale, peperoncino dolce, semi di finocchio selvatico.

Galbanetto

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Salsiccia Lucania dolce or Galbanetto?

Overall, Galbanetto has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Galbanetto has fewer calories: 305 kcal versus 315 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Salsiccia Lucania dolce has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Salsiccia Lucania dolce vs Golfetta Salame di Prosc... Galbanetto vs Golfetta Salame di Prosc... Galbanetto vs Speck Salsiccia Lucania dolce vs Speck Salsiccia Lucania dolce vs Coppa stagionata Coppa stagionata vs Galbanetto Salsiccia Lucania dolce vs I salumi da ';cinta sene... I salumi da ';cinta sene... vs Galbanetto