Comparison
Salmone affumicato vs Nero di seppia
Overall, Nero di seppia has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Salmone affumicato | Nero di seppia |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 123 kcal | 36 kcal |
| Fat | 2.6 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.6 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.8 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 2.9 g | 2.6 g |
| Protein | 24 g | 5.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Molluscs |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Nero di seppia has 71% fewer calories (36 kcal vs 123 kcal).
- Nero di seppia has no fat, while Salmone affumicato has 2.6 g.
- Nero di seppia has no saturated fat, while Salmone affumicato has 0.6 g.
- Nero di seppia has no sugar, while Salmone affumicato has 0.8 g.
- Salmone affumicato has 79% more protein (24 g vs 5.1 g).
- Only Nero di seppia lists: Molluscs.
Ingredients
Salmone affumicato
Not available.
Nero di seppia
NERO DI SEPPIA, ACQUA, SALE ADDENSANTE: E415. CONTIENE MOLLUSCHI E CROSTACEL
FAQ
Which is healthier: Salmone affumicato or Nero di seppia?
Overall, Nero di seppia has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Nero di seppia has fewer calories: 36 kcal versus 123 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Nero di seppia has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.8 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Bottarga di muggine vs Salmone affumicato
Salmone affumicato vs Polpa di riccio di mare
Salmone affumicato vs Polpa di granchio
Boutargue Classique vs Salmone affumicato
Boutargue classique vs Nero di seppia
Boutargue classique vs Salmone affumicato
Nero di seppia vs Bottarga di tonno
Bottarga di muggine vs Nero di seppia