Comparison

Bottarga di muggine vs Nero di seppia

Overall, Nero di seppia has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient	Bottarga di muggine	Nero di seppia
Nutri-Score	e	d
NOVA group	—	4
Calories	427 kcal	36 kcal
Fat	27 g	0 g
Saturated fat	6.9 g	0 g
Sugars	0 g	0 g
Salt	4 g	2.6 g
Fiber	0 g	—
Protein	43 g	5.1 g
Additives	0	1
Allergens	None listed	Molluscs

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

Nero di seppia has 92% fewer calories (36 kcal vs 427 kcal).
Nero di seppia has no fat, while Bottarga di muggine has 27 g.
Nero di seppia has no saturated fat, while Bottarga di muggine has 6.9 g.
Nero di seppia has 35% less salt (2.6 g vs 4 g).
Bottarga di muggine has 88% more protein (43 g vs 5.1 g).
Nero di seppia has the better Nutri-Score.
Only Nero di seppia lists: Molluscs.

Ingredients

Bottarga di muggine

Not available.

Nero di seppia

NERO DI SEPPIA, ACQUA, SALE ADDENSANTE: E415. CONTIENE MOLLUSCHI E CROSTACEL

FAQ

Which is healthier: Bottarga di muggine or Nero di seppia?

Overall, Nero di seppia has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Nero di seppia has fewer calories: 36 kcal versus 427 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Bottarga di muggine has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Bottarga di muggine vs Bottarga di tonno Bottarga di muggine vs Salmone affumicato Bottarga di muggine vs Polpa di riccio di mare Bottarga di muggine vs Polpa di granchio Boutargue Classique vs Bottarga di muggine Boutargue classique vs Nero di seppia Boutargue classique vs Bottarga di muggine Nero di seppia vs Bottarga di tonno