Royal Chambord Galette vs Turco
Overall, Turco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Royal Chambord Galette | Turco |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 640 kcal | 471 kcal |
| Fat | 46.9 g | 19.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 17.8 g | 4.7 g |
| Sugars | 1.2 g | 17.2 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 1.3 g |
| Fiber | 4.5 g | 6 g |
| Protein | 6.9 g | 8.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 4 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Gluten, Milk | Eggs, Gluten, Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Turco has 26% fewer calories (471 kcal vs 640 kcal).
- Turco has 58% less fat (19.5 g vs 46.9 g).
- Turco has 74% less saturated fat (4.7 g vs 17.8 g).
- Royal Chambord Galette has 93% less sugar (1.2 g vs 17.2 g).
- Royal Chambord Galette has 85% less salt (0.2 g vs 1.3 g).
- Turco has 26% more fiber (6 g vs 4.5 g).
- Turco has 17% more protein (8.3 g vs 6.9 g).
- Royal Chambord Galette is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Royal Chambord Galette
_Wheat_ flour, butter (_milk_), sugar, _eggs_, water, fin sea salt, gilding (_eggs_, water)
Turco
Farina di grano tenero tipo 2 ( 46%), farina di grano tenero integrale (20%), olio di girasole alto oleico (14%), zucchero, burro, estratto di malto d'orzo e mais, uova fresche ( 2.5%), latte scremato in polvere, inulina (2%), agenti lievitanti (carbonato acido di sodio, carbonato acido di ammonio), sale marino integrale (0.5%), lecitina di girasole, aromi
FAQ
Which is healthier: Royal Chambord Galette or Turco?
Overall, Turco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Turco has fewer calories: 471 kcal versus 640 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Royal Chambord Galette has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 17.2 g per 100 g.