Royal Chambord Galette vs Brago Original
Overall, Royal Chambord Galette has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Royal Chambord Galette
Brago Original
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Royal Chambord Galette | Brago Original |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 640 kcal | 471 kcal |
| Fat | 46.9 g | 18 g |
| Saturated fat | 17.8 g | 2.3 g |
| Sugars | 1.2 g | 22 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | 4.5 g | 2 g |
| Protein | 6.9 g | 6.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Gluten, Milk | Gluten, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Brago Original has 26% fewer calories (471 kcal vs 640 kcal).
- Brago Original has 62% less fat (18 g vs 46.9 g).
- Brago Original has 87% less saturated fat (2.3 g vs 17.8 g).
- Royal Chambord Galette has 95% less sugar (1.2 g vs 22 g).
- Royal Chambord Galette has 71% less salt (0.2 g vs 0.7 g).
- Royal Chambord Galette has 55% more fiber (4.5 g vs 2 g).
- Royal Chambord Galette is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Royal Chambord Galette lists: Eggs, Milk.
- Only Brago Original lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Royal Chambord Galette
_Wheat_ flour, butter (_milk_), sugar, _eggs_, water, fin sea salt, gilding (_eggs_, water)
Brago Original
_Vetemjöl_, socker, solrosolja, _vetestärkelse_, sirap, salt, bakpulver (natriumbikarbonat, hjorthornssalt E503), emulgeringsmedel (solroslecitin), aromer, kornmalt.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Royal Chambord Galette or Brago Original?
Overall, Royal Chambord Galette has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Brago Original has fewer calories: 471 kcal versus 640 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Royal Chambord Galette has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 22 g per 100 g.