Rôti de porc aux herbes vs Lomo Asado al Horno
Overall, Lomo Asado al Horno has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Rôti de porc aux herbes
Lomo Asado al Horno
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rôti de porc aux herbes | Lomo Asado al Horno |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 126 kcal | 142 kcal |
| Fat | 4 g | 4.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.6 g | 1.4 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.9 g | 1.3 g |
| Protein | 22 g | 26 g |
| Additives | 3 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rôti de porc aux herbes has 11% fewer calories (126 kcal vs 142 kcal).
- Lomo Asado al Horno has 33% less salt (1.3 g vs 1.9 g).
- Lomo Asado al Horno has 15% more protein (26 g vs 22 g).
- Lomo Asado al Horno has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Rôti de porc aux herbes
4 tranches de rôti cuit, bruni, qualité supérieure aux herbes de Provence, traité en salaison, Ingrédients: 90% filet de porc (Origine: France), eau, sel, arômes naturels, dextrose, bouillon de porc déshydraté (eau, os, viande de porc, extrait de carotte, extrait de poireau), 0,2% épices, 0,1% herbes de Provence (romarin, thym, basilic, marjolaine, origan), sirop de glucose, conservateurs: chlorure de potassium, nitrite de sodium, antioxydant: ascorbate de sodium, colorant: caramel ordinaire, Non ouvert à concomi
Lomo Asado al Horno
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rôti de porc aux herbes or Lomo Asado al Horno?
Overall, Lomo Asado al Horno has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rôti de porc aux herbes has fewer calories: 126 kcal versus 142 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rôti de porc aux herbes has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.