Dés d'Épaule vs Lomo Asado al Horno
Overall, Lomo Asado al Horno has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Dés d'Épaule
Lomo Asado al Horno
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Dés d'Épaule | Lomo Asado al Horno |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 130 kcal | 142 kcal |
| Fat | 6 g | 4.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.2 g | 1.4 g |
| Sugars | 1.9 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.8 g | 1.3 g |
| Protein | 17 g | 26 g |
| Additives | 5 | 0 |
| Allergens | Celery | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Lomo Asado al Horno has 32% less fat (4.1 g vs 6 g).
- Lomo Asado al Horno has 36% less saturated fat (1.4 g vs 2.2 g).
- Lomo Asado al Horno has 74% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.9 g).
- Lomo Asado al Horno has 29% less salt (1.3 g vs 1.8 g).
- Lomo Asado al Horno has 35% more protein (26 g vs 17 g).
- Lomo Asado al Horno has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Dés d'Épaule lists: Celery.
Ingredients
Dés d'Épaule
Épaule de porc 68%, jambon de porc, eau, acidifiant : lactate de potassium, sel, dextrose, bouillon (eau, os de porc, céleri, plantes aromatiques, viande de porc, jus concentrés de céleri et carotte, épices), stabilisant diphosphates, gélatine de porc, arômes naturels, chlorure de potassium, poivre, antioxydants: ascorbate de sodium acide ascorbique, conservateurs vinaigre tamponné nitrite de sodium. Viande de porc origine UE.
Lomo Asado al Horno
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Dés d'Épaule or Lomo Asado al Horno?
Overall, Lomo Asado al Horno has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Dés d'Épaule has fewer calories: 130 kcal versus 142 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Lomo Asado al Horno has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.9 g per 100 g.