Comparison

Rote Beete Meerrettich Aufstrich vs Ajo y Perejil

Overall, Ajo y Perejil has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 4.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRote Beete Meerrettich Aufst...Ajo y Perejil
Nutri-Score c e
NOVA group 3 1
Calories 301 kcal 246 kcal
Fat 27 g 1.5 g
Saturated fat 2.8 g 1.1 g
Sugars 5.5 g 7 g
Salt 1.2 g 31.1 g
Fiber 2 g 3.3 g
Protein 4.3 g 11.1 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Ajo y Perejil has 18% fewer calories (246 kcal vs 301 kcal).
  • Ajo y Perejil has 94% less fat (1.5 g vs 27 g).
  • Ajo y Perejil has 61% less saturated fat (1.1 g vs 2.8 g).
  • Rote Beete Meerrettich Aufstrich has 21% less sugar (5.5 g vs 7 g).
  • Rote Beete Meerrettich Aufstrich has 96% less salt (1.2 g vs 31.1 g).
  • Ajo y Perejil has 39% more fiber (3.3 g vs 2 g).
  • Ajo y Perejil has 61% more protein (11.1 g vs 4.3 g).
  • Rote Beete Meerrettich Aufstrich has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Ajo y Perejil is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Rote Beete Meerrettich Aufstrich

Rote Bete 34%, Sonnenblumenöl, Wasser, Sonnenblumenkerne, Meerrettichzubereitung' 8,8% (Meer - rettich' 78%, Branntweinessig', Wasser, Meersalz), Rote-Bete-Saft - konzentrat 3%, Zitronensaftkonzentrat, Apfelsaftkonzentrat, Meersalz, Maisstärke, Branntweinessig

Ajo y Perejil

especias (35% ajo, cebolla, 7% PE y y pimienta negra

FAQ

Which is healthier: Rote Beete Meerrettich Aufstrich or Ajo y Perejil?

Overall, Ajo y Perejil has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Ajo y Perejil has fewer calories: 246 kcal versus 301 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Rote Beete Meerrettich Aufstrich has less sugar: 5.5 g versus 7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons