Rosemary Crackers vs Ricanela
Overall, Rosemary Crackers has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rosemary Crackers | Ricanela |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 482 kcal | 482 kcal |
| Fat | 19.4 g | 20 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.1 g | 7.6 g |
| Sugars | 3.3 g | 25 g |
| Salt | 1.3 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 3.2 g | 2 g |
| Protein | 9 g | 5.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rosemary Crackers has 20% less saturated fat (6.1 g vs 7.6 g).
- Rosemary Crackers has 87% less sugar (3.3 g vs 25 g).
- Ricanela has no salt, while Rosemary Crackers has 1.3 g.
- Rosemary Crackers has 38% more fiber (3.2 g vs 2 g).
- Rosemary Crackers has 39% more protein (9 g vs 5.5 g).
- Rosemary Crackers has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Rosemary Crackers lists: Gluten, Milk.
Ingredients
Rosemary Crackers
Wheat Flour (Wheat Flour, Calcium Carbonate, Niacin, Iron, Thiamin), Palm Oil, High Oleic Sunflower Oil, Sea Salt, Garlic Powder, GROUND ROSEMARY (1%), Autolysed Yeast, Dextrose, Onion Powder, Sugar, Whey Powder (Milk), Partially Inverted Refiners Syrup, Flavouring, Dried Yeast, Black Pepper.
Ricanela
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rosemary Crackers or Ricanela?
Overall, Rosemary Crackers has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rosemary Crackers has fewer calories: 482 kcal versus 482 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rosemary Crackers has less sugar: 3.3 g versus 25 g per 100 g.