Comparison

Rocher coco vs White Crisp

Overall, White Crisp has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRocher cocoWhite Crisp
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 598 kcal 484 kcal
Fat 41 g 29 g
Saturated fat 26 g 18 g
Sugars 52 g 9 g
Salt 0.2 g 0.5 g
Fiber 0 g 5 g
Protein 5.1 g 30 g
Additives20
AllergensMilk, Soybeans, Lécithine de soja, Poudre de laitNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • White Crisp has 19% fewer calories (484 kcal vs 598 kcal).
  • White Crisp has 29% less fat (29 g vs 41 g).
  • White Crisp has 31% less saturated fat (18 g vs 26 g).
  • White Crisp has 83% less sugar (9 g vs 52 g).
  • Rocher coco has 63% less salt (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
  • White Crisp has 100% more fiber (5 g vs 0 g).
  • White Crisp has 83% more protein (30 g vs 5.1 g).
  • White Crisp has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Rocher coco lists: Milk, Soybeans, Lécithine de soja, Poudre de lait.

Ingredients

Rocher coco

Sucre, beurre de cacao, poudre de lait, beurre laitier concentré, lactose, noix de coco caramélisée 4% (noix de coco, sucre), émulsifiant (lécithine de soja), arôme naturel, arôme. Peut contenir du blé, des noisettes, des amandes et d'autres fruits à coque.

White Crisp

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Rocher coco or White Crisp?

Overall, White Crisp has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

White Crisp has fewer calories: 484 kcal versus 598 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

White Crisp has less sugar: 9 g versus 52 g per 100 g.

More comparisons