Comparison
White Crisp vs Chocolate Blanco
Overall, White Crisp has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | White Crisp | Chocolate Blanco |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 484 kcal | 533 kcal |
| Fat | 29 g | 28 g |
| Saturated fat | 18 g | 17.3 g |
| Sugars | 9 g | 65.3 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 5 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 30 g | 4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- White Crisp has 86% less sugar (9 g vs 65.3 g).
- White Crisp has 100% more fiber (5 g vs 0 g).
- White Crisp has 87% more protein (30 g vs 4 g).
- White Crisp has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Chocolate Blanco lists: Milk, Soybeans.
Ingredients
White Crisp
Not available.
Chocolate Blanco
Suiker, cacaoboter, magere MELKPOEDER, weipoeder (van MELK), MELKVET, emulgator (SOJALECITHINEN), aroma.
FAQ
Which is healthier: White Crisp or Chocolate Blanco?
Overall, White Crisp has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
White Crisp has fewer calories: 484 kcal versus 533 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
White Crisp has less sugar: 9 g versus 65.3 g per 100 g.