Comparison

GALAK Chocolat Blanc Tablette 2x100g vs White Crisp

Overall, White Crisp has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientGALAK Chocolat Blanc Tablett...White Crisp
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 555 kcal 484 kcal
Fat 32.5 g 29 g
Saturated fat 19.5 g 18 g
Sugars 57.4 g 9 g
Salt 0.2 g 0.5 g
Fiber 0.5 g 5 g
Protein 3.7 g 30 g
Additives10
AllergensMilkNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • White Crisp has 13% fewer calories (484 kcal vs 555 kcal).
  • White Crisp has 11% less fat (29 g vs 32.5 g).
  • White Crisp has 84% less sugar (9 g vs 57.4 g).
  • GALAK Chocolat Blanc Tablette 2x100g has 67% less salt (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
  • White Crisp has 90% more fiber (5 g vs 0.5 g).
  • White Crisp has 88% more protein (30 g vs 3.7 g).
  • White Crisp has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only GALAK Chocolat Blanc Tablette 2x100g lists: Milk.

Ingredients

GALAK Chocolat Blanc Tablette 2x100g

Sucre, beurre de cacao¹, LAIT écrémé en poudre (8,9%), PETIT-LAIT en poudre, matière grasse de LAIT anhydre, sirop de glucose, émulsifiant (lécithines), arôme naturel de vanille. Peut contenir: FRUITS À COQUE. ¹Bilan massique certifié Rainforest Alliance. www.ra.org/fr

White Crisp

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: GALAK Chocolat Blanc Tablette 2x100g or White Crisp?

Overall, White Crisp has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

White Crisp has fewer calories: 484 kcal versus 555 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

White Crisp has less sugar: 9 g versus 57.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons